Behind the Mask
In late April, when Asians pay respects to the dead, four
members of the cabinet led by Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso and more than 150
members of parliament made a pilgrimage to the Yasukuni Shrine in downtown
Tokyo. It honors the spirits Japanese
war dead, but also includes those of 14 Class-A war criminals condemned and
executed for plotting to invade neighboring countries.
Abe was not among them, but his statements in defense of
their visit were perhaps more belicose than they had to be. “My ministers will
not yield to any kind of intimidation.” He told parliament defiantly. It is
natural, he said, to express respect to those who have died for their county.
He donated a tree as a personal offering.
The visits were condemned not just from South Korea and
China, as one might expect, but also from opinion leaders in the United State
and abroad. Both the Washington Post
and New York Times denounced the visits,
especially as they came at a sensitive time when relations with between Japan
and its neighbors are strained and North Korea is making threats.
Washington made no official protest itself, but can hardly
be pleased with this sudden shift toward Japanese nationalism. Its desires to bring
Seoul and Tokyo closer together to form a united front against North Korea
provocations are constantly undercut by these unnecessary and provocative pilgrimages
to the shrine.
The last time the Yasukuni roiled relations with neighbors
was during the long (by Japanese standards) administration of Junichiro
Koizumi, who made annual visits to the shrine in his official capacity.
Ironically it was his successor, Abe, who restored relations and good will with
China by declining to visit the shrine, something he now says he deeply
regrets.
The Yasukuni Shrine has long been connected with state
Shinto and an ultranationalist and inflammatory interpretation of Japan’s
actions in World War II as being a wholly selfless effort to liberate Asia of
European colonialism. Needless to say, other countries occupied by Japan don’t
see things that way.
During the first months of his administration, Abe successfully
suppressed what the Financial Times
called in an editorial his hidden “inner nationalism.” His plan was to
concentrate laser-like on economic revival building up popularity, well aware
that his unpopular focus on history and the constitution had undercut his
government and led to his resignation after only one year in office in 2007.
It may be that his government’s continuing popularity as
expressed in public opinion polls that show that more than 70 percent of
Japanese approve of his initial moves to revive the economy, called “abenomics” may be going to his head and that he, to
again quote the Financial Times, “let
the mask slip.”
The general election for half of the House of Councillors,
the upper house of Japan’s bicameral parliament scheduled for July, was also
said to exert some restraint, as Abe is very keen on winning. But the
government seems to believe more and more that the election is in the bag. The
recent landslide election of the LDP candidate in a upper house bye election on
April 28 seems to support that notion.
On that same day, the government held what was billed as first
“National Sovereignty Day.” The date was said to commemorate the 61st
anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco in 1952, which
restored Japan sovereignty and ended the American Occupation (save for Okinawa
which was returned only in 1972.)
Speaking in the presence of the Emperor and Empress, Abe said
“the next task for us is to revise the Constitution” That goal called attention
to another conservative obsession, revising the constitution that was written
by Americans during the Occupation. It seemed to have lot to do with the elevation
of the date, April 28, which previously had no special meaning to most Japanese.
Amending or abolishing the constitution in favor of a new
one has been a hobby horse of Japanese conservatives, including Abe for years.
They say that it is humiliating to be governed under a document written mainly
by foreign occupiers. The extreme nationalist Shintaro Ishihara says he would
have ditched the whole thing as soon as Japan was free to do so.
Ishihara is not a fringe figure. He is the co-leader of the
Japan Restoration Party, which with 51 seats is the third largest bloc in the
lower house of parliament. The other co-leader, Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto,
shares his feelings about changing the charter.
Abe has already had meeting with leaders of this party and
the two could easily put together the two-thirds majority needed to change the
document (whether the two thirds could be mustered in the upper house even
after an electoral victory is debatable.) Their first move will be to change
that rule to allow a simple majority enough to approve amendments subject to a
national plebiscite.
Although most attention is focused on repealing or altering
the famous “no war” Article 9, the LDP’s proposed alternative charter, made
public a year ago even before the general election, goes much further in
replacing what it terms foreign universal values with more traditional Japanese
values, as they view them.
Many will be watching what the new government does in
August, the traditional time, linked to Japan’s surrender on August 15, when Japanese leaders make official visits to
the Yasukuni shrine if in fact they are going to make them. Whether they make
the visits may depend on how the Japanese public reacts to this recent testing
of the political waters.
At the moment there
are no current public opinion polls to test the public reaction (though much
commentary on Sunday talks shows was negative). One thing is fairly certain.
The Abe administration will be more strongly influenced by local opinion than
that of its neighbors.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home