Baroness Hong Kong
As the swinging 70s gave way to the more anxious 1980s, people in Hong Kong became increasingly apprehensive about a fast-approaching, though once comfortably distant, date – 1997, the expiry date for the vast (by Hong Kong definition) hinterland acquired in 1898 on a 99-year lease and still known as the “New” Territories.
Many businessmen were growing anxious about the uncertain impact
of this impending change would have on business basics: would land leases be
extended beyond that date (virtually all land in Hong Kong then as now is
“crown” land and parceled out on long-term leases?) Would contracts be honored?
More to the point: What did China intend to do with Hong Kong?
It was against this background that British Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher made her famous first visit to Beijing in September, 1982, to
begin negotiating the future of the British colony with the Chinese Communist government
of Deng Xiaoping. The meeting did not go that well.
Thatcher went to Beijing hoping to persuade China’s leaders
that continuing British administration of the territory was necessary for the
stability and prosperity of Hong Kong. The chaos of the Cultural Revolution,
which essentially ended only with Mao Zedong’s death in 1976, was still a vivid
memory, China’s revolutionary opening and reforms only just beginning.
She knew relatively little about China or Hong Kong,
although she was undoubtedly briefed that China did not recognize as valid the
19th century treaties that had ceded Hong Kong island and the tip of
Kowloon peninsula to Britain “in perpetuity” after the Opium Wars. She must
also have known that Hong Kong could not continue as a viable
entity without the New Territories.
The prime minister, however, seemed to think she had a duty to at
least try to uphold the validity of 19th century treaties, that she
claimed were still valid under any consideration of international law. The
issue came down to sovereignty. Would Britain keep it beyond 1997, or would they
have to surrender the entire territory?
For his part, Deng Xiaoping was unmovable on the notion that
China would resume full sovereignty. Anything less would make him complicit in
the treasonous territorial giveaways of the late Qing Dynasty. Otherwise, he
was willing to grant generous concessions guaranteeing Hong Kong’s way of life
and liberties post-1997 under his famous but never before tried one-nation, two
systems formulation.
Much has been made in retrospectives following Mrs.
Thatcher’s recent death of how the “Iron Lady” had met her match in Deng. This
is unfortunate. To be sure Deng, a former revolutionary war commander, was a
tough hombre. But in truth Thatcher had a weak hand, which she was smart enough
to understand. As the British would say, continued colonial administration of
Hong Kong was just not on.
It took two more years of difficult negotiations for the
British to finally come around to this position. They were trying times. In
October, 1983, when it appeared that negotiations might collapse, the Hong Kong
dollar began to plunge in value. That led to the pegging of the currency at 7.8
to the U.S. dollar, a peg that continues to this day.
In 1984 London formally agreed to surrender sovereignty over
the entire territory, which Thatcher confirmed in a letter to Chinese premier
Zhao Ziyang. Later she made her second trip to Beijing to formally sign the
Joint Declaration at a ceremony in the Great Hall of the People.
Thatcher had been out of office for seven years when the
actual transition ceremony took place at midnight June 30, 1997, so she didn’t
have to sit on the dais and watch the Union flag lowered for the last time.
That role fell to newly minted Prime Minister Tony Blair. She was probably happy
to be out of it.
In 2007 Thatcher gave an interview that expressed “regret”
that she could not have persuaded China to accept continued British rule. But
there is no shame in playing a leading part in what was one of the most enlightened
yet practical acts of diplomacy in modern times. It gave Hong Kong people far
more autonomy over their affairs than any of the so-called “autonomous regions”
in China proper.
Most of the commentary on Thatcher’s death both in Hong Kong
and China was laudatory. “We have no reason not to show our respect to this woman
who signed the Sino-British Joint Declaration,” wrote the Global Times, an affiliate of the official government organ the China Daily.
Actually, the British political figure that Beijing truly
hated was the last governor Christopher Patten (appointed by Thatcher’s
successor John Major). He took a confrontational attitude tone with Beijing
which hit back with such endearing terms as “sinner of a thousand years”. It
will be interesting to see how the Chinese press handles his death, if it
acknowledges it at all.
As Hong Kong and China look back on the nearly sixteen years
since Hong Kong reverted to Chinese sovereignty, both find their worst fears
unrealized but so too their best hopes. Many Hong Kongers, though recognizing
that their basic liberties are intact, are still disappointed that the
territory is only partially democratic with only vague promises if more to come
later.
For its part, Beijing is happy that the territory has not
become, as it had feared, a base to subvert the communist rule on the mainland.
But it is a source of disappointment that their punctilious observation of the
terms of the Joint Declaration has not earned them much love. Hong Kong people
still think of themselves as Hong Kongers first and Chinese (as in citizens of the
People’s Republic of China) second.
Indeed, tensions between Hong Kong people and mainland
Chinese visitors have been rising in recent years as newly rich Chinese jack up
property prices and hog space in maternity wards to give birth to “anchor
babies”. Of late, protestors have taken to displaying the old British colonial
flag. It is meant mostly to irritate Beijing, not nostalgia for colonial days.
But one imagines that Thatcher would take a quiet satisfaction from the sight.
*Todd Crowell is the
author of Farewell, My Colony: Last Days in the life of British Hong Kong
1 Comments:
Lot of post about cable & equipment.
Thanks for information. Products of cable & wire is of best quality. I see blog when I search for design of cable & equipments. our company have the quality prodcuts - Tng-design.
Post a Comment
<< Home