They Felt the Pain
Anyone who was in Japan on March 11, 2011, when the 9 pt. Richter Scale Earthquake struck, has a story to tell. As for myself, I was in a downtown travel agency, ironically making arrangements to leave Japan on a short trip, Making my way to the railroad station to find a way home, I saw one of those big screens repeating the word “Sendai” a large city 200 miles to the north.
I thought to myself: “If it is this bad here, Sendai must be devastated!”
In fact, Sendai, survived the earthquake and tsunami with
relatively little damage. The same could not be said of the numerous much smaller cities and villages hugging the
Pacific Coast that were demolished by the quake, and more importantly the 13
meter-high wall of water that came crashing through shortly after.
Nearly two years after what the Japanese call the “triple
disaster” of earthquake tsunami and the multiple nuclear meltdowns at the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, some of the stories are now being told
in books, of which perhaps the best in English is Strong in the Rain (Palgrave, Macmillan, 205 pages) by two veteran
Japan correspondents, Lucy Birmingham and David McNeill.
No definitive count has yet been made, or perhaps can ever
be made, of the number of people who died on that day, many presumably swept
away in the deluge. The general figure of about 20,000 is used. The tsunami was
particularly hard on the elderly, who formed a large part of the population in
this rather depressed part of Japan.
One intriguing figure in the book amidst that large number is
575, which is the number of elderly, infirm and ill people whose condition was
too delicate to withstand the trauma of evacuation from hospitals or nursing
homes that were located within the 20 km mandatory evacuation zone surrounding
the nuclear plant. It is a useful figure to keep in mind when one hears that no
deaths resulted from meltdowns.
The authors’ approach is anecdotal. They tell the story through
individuals, such as Katsunobu Sakurai, the mayor of the town of Minomisoma, or
David Chumreonlert, a Thai-American who was teaching English or Kai Watanabe an
ordinary worker at the Fukushima nuclear plant, even Corp. Kevin Miller, a U.S.
Marine who was among the many American servicemen mobilized to help.
The confused and chaotic response in the early days of the
disaster is surprising considering how vulnerable Japan is to earthquakes and
other natural disasters. The country has an extensive earthquake monitoring and
prediction system, but nothing similar to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). The nuclear crisis was handled mostly on the fly from the prime
minister’s office in Tokyo.
The most useful service was probably provided by the Self
Defense Forces (Japan’s military). Early on Prime Minister Naoto Kan mobilized
about 100,000 troops, nearly half of the total armed forces for duty in the
stricken area, where they did the gruesome but necessary work of recovering the
bodies as well as providing shelter and food for the many who had lost their
homes.
The U.S. pitched in providing some 24,000 service men drawn
from the bases around Japan in what was billed as Operation Tomodachi (friend
in Japanese), and may have been the country’s largest disaster response. It was
largely unheralded in the U.S. but not forgotten by the Japanese, whose respect
for both the Japanese and US military was enhanced.
This part of Japan has a history of devastating tsunami
stretching back as far as the 8th Century. Yet the planning was
haphazard at best. A few small towns were prescient to build breakwaters and
sea walls that were tall and strong enough to withstand the force of the
tsunami; many others were simply bowled over by the wall of water.
The authors recount the often wrenching decision that many
foreigners living in Japan had to make in response to the crisis. Many
embassies, though not the American, moved out of Tokyo or advised their
citizens to leave the capital or Japan entirely. In all, about 30 foreign
missions left Tokyo in the first two weeks of the disaster, setting up
temporary operations out of hotel rooms in Osaka and Kobe. They would filter
back into Tokyo as the fears of radiation receded and workmen seemed to be
making progress in stabilizing the nuclear plants.
Those that left Japan earned the local sobriquet “flygin”, a
play on gaijin the word for foreigner
sometimes leaving their Japanese business associates or fellow teachers in the
lurch. In their defense, many were hearing heartfelt pleas from family and
relatives abroad, frightened by often sensational accounts of radiation heading
to Tokyo, to get out of Japan immediately. Many found the pleas hard to resist.
Strong in the Rain
is a relatively thin volume (fewer than 200 pages), more in the line of a first
draft of history rather than a definitive account of what’s been called the
worst disaster in Japan’s post-war history. And it is fairly comprehensive,
covering the tsunami, the nuclear disaster, reactions in the rest of Japan and
abroad, even funeral arrangements and an epilogue of where the story tellers
are now.Many mysteries are still buried in the ruble of the devastated coastline or deep in the bowels of the nuclear reactors, where technicians are still don’t know the exact condition and precise location of the melted cores. The authors have done a good job of collecting stories. There are many more to be told.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home